Post Info TOPIC: Nationalism and Sindh
Akhter Sheikh

Date:
Nationalism and Sindh
Permalink   


Nationalism is a disputed but undeniably potent ideology of the modern
world .

Across the globle ,politics passions are continuously excited by the call of
national allegiances . war and civil in Rawanad and Ireland and Bosinia
testify to impact of the destructive and passionate force of nationalism .
The history of the modern world bears witness to the terrible conflict emerging
from the heart of Europe over disputes about national identity and integrity
while disinterested academics (like Kedourie in has book nationalism 1966)
might point up the fuzziness of nationalist accounts of political legitimacy,
the flash and blood populations of states are still sawed by appeal to their
national character. Part of the suspicion with which nationalism is viewed
asides in its capacity to excite passion, myth and emotion, which play
unpredictable but significant roles in the economy of human existence.

As political ideology nationalism must be understood as making claims about
politics and how states should organized

This political doctrine or ideology of nationalism is linked with general
patriotic and nationalist notion of support for nations. The ideology of
nationalism itself, though , is concerned with the bases of political
organization and government , humanity and conceived as being divided up
into groups ,and the nation is taken as unit for government .political
organization .Hence , the characteristic principle of nationalism is national
self-determination .the central concept of nation problematic .it allows for no
straightforward definition . A range of diverse criteria are invoked to
explain and justify the nation ,nation are defined in terms of
race ,culture ,language , history ,different civilization and geography . the
profusion of constuent ingredients of nationhood tends to reinforce the
suspicion that there is no clear way of distinguishing and defining nations.
The nationalist move of identifying blocks for territorial units of political
life .However ,nation
states are often in dispute over territories , and people of diverse ethic
allegiance are often set in same states and intermingle in countless ways ,
these things render the prospected of state of state exemplifying a single
national identity in plausible in the exterem

So that we want to arise a question with all that IS PAKISTAN A STATE OF ONE
NATION??


__________________
raja mehran unar

Date:
Permalink   

dear sindhi!
jeay sindhu desh :smile:
pakistan jeeko sain gm sayed jee chawan mutabiq hik wado pap ahey aeen hin
pakistan jee ander sindhi nation khe jeeko nuksan pehto ahey otro nuksan
araban ,khiljeen,turkhanan ,iranin, aeen other looteran na dino ahey sindh
khe mukamal ghulami ji bahey men uchliyo wayo ahey aeen aj sindhi qaum
mukamal ghulam ahey hik state ji uha ahey punjab. sindh jee har waseelan te
punjab qabiz ahey aeen asan ji ka bhi gall na the budee wajeen un soorat
hall men asan khe cha karan ghurjee uho har bashohor sindhi samjhey tho .

tawan jo
raja mehran unar


__________________
Lal Gehi

Date:
Permalink   

If Pakistan was one nation:

1. There would be justice for all Pakistanis .

2. Why Sindhi political prisoners are kept in prison till they die or only
military style justice is imposed on them ?
3. Why Sindhi politicians, like Ms. Benazeer Bhutto, have to seek refuge in
other country to fight for their rights and justice.?
4. Why Sindh can not enjoy equal and fair share of their earnings, but instead
ignored and isolated from government and high rank military positions.?
5. Is it not the head of this country himself discriminates Sindhis, by saying
that "Sindhis are not capable to serve in government positions"?!
6. The great Sindhi leader, Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, who made sacrifices to
unite the people of Pakistan was murdered by the dictator and killed the spirit
of democracy and one nation.?!
7. If Pakistan ever was one nation, the Bangladesh would not have born.!!

Jeay Sindh.
Lal Gehi.

__________________
Imran Almani

Date:
Permalink   

Dear Friends
As to the question raised by a dear friend of mine Mr Akhter as to whether Pakistan(PUNJABISTAN) was one country and its nations formed one nation, I would like to answer his question in the words of the founder of the country Mr Jinnah when Sain G M Syed asked him as to how he viewed the future of Pakistan(PUNJABISTAN) to which he replied:
"Pakistan(PUNJABISTAN) will be a Federation of different nations for instance PUNJAB WILL BE AN INDEPENDENT, AUTONOMOUS AND SOVEREIGN UNIT OF PAKISTAN(PUNJABISTAN)."

This was how the founder of the country thought of Pakistan(PUNJABISTAN) and its future and despite the fact that I do not personally like Mr Jinnah for the way he sacrificed the unity of India at the altar of his arrogance and stubbornness, there is no denying the fact that he was a practical politician nonetheless and like all political politicians, he very well knew that Pakistan(PUNJABISTAN) would be a house to different nations and would only survive if the nations living under it would coexist in harmony and peacefully respecting each others' rights.

Punjabi rulers of their beloved country PUNJABISTAN did not pay any heed to what the founder of their country had to say about its future until the EAST PAKISTAN became BENGLADESH in the 70s and that was the end of MR JINNAH'S PAKISTAN. Today no Pakistan exists on the map of the world but what we see in the name of Pakistan is PUNJAB and the rest of the nations under it namely, the Sindhis, the Balouchs, and the Pushtuns its SUBJUGATED SUBJECTS who were born it seems to me to be oppressed by the notorious Punjabi masters of the country.
The day is not far when their Punjabistan will cease to exist on the map of the world and all the suppressed nations under it will finally get their freedom from their grip.



IMRAN ALMANI


__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard